Dear Ken,
1. Did you openly read books about RAD, and do computer research about RAD, in front of the boy? Did he realize you were gearing up to work “from a stategy”, to help him?
2. Does the Daniel Hughes method rely on one person (a mother-figure ) to provide the main interaction? Does this person have to be a stay-at-home woman? Currently, the boy lives with an older man and wife, and a younger mom-figure, whom he gravitates to, but who works at a job. If regular school does not work out this fall, he may be at home, with the older woman (she is helpful and available, but no real healing bond). The household is trying to act “as One”, but they are currently using traditional parenting methods. If we are successful to get the household to do RAD-parenting, then the “one” mother-figure person would take on more importance, it sounds like.
3. How is a the RADkid kept “under control” at school? With a RAD-trained teacher? Is there such a thing? Hopefully,he would be in Special Ed, a “Person of Concern”, but, if I understand it right, many teachers have not heard of RAD. Have you ever watched the 3-hour video by Nancy Thomas,”Captive in the Classroom”? It is suggested that the video is supposed to be given to the Special Ed teacher by the parents? Would this help keep the RADkid in line for 6 hours? Vickie, Seattle
Our nephew was twelve when he came to live with us, and had developed a very good public face. For that reason, those who did not know him well didn’t know that he was disordered. Some parents wished that their children would be as nice as he was. That’s not surprising. Although we later learned of a few things that we had been unaware of at the time, his first month with us was very pleasant.
Once diagnosed, at first we tried to keep it from him. Of course, anyone who has ever spent any time with a child with reactive attachment disorder soon learns that it’s very difficult to keep anything from them. He walked into the room while I was working on the web site one day. I switched to another screen but he asked, “What’s radioactive attachment disorder?”
Since one of our main objectives in parenting him was to develop trust, I couldn’t find my way to lying to him about it. I explained it to him, and he listened carefully. I told him, of course, that it was reactive attachment disorder, and that this was what his psychologist thought that he had, explaining that none of it was his fault. The conversation actually led to some worthwhile discussion about emotion, and his chief concern was that we were going to tell everyone about it.
My response was that it wasn’t anyone else’s business unless he made it so, that we wouldn’t discuss it with anyone else unless we felt that we had to do so in order to protect ourselves. Explaining to him that his desire to make us look bad to everyone else was actually a part of the disorder, and that if he put us into a position where we felt that we had to discuss his diagnosis with someone in order to prevent them from believing that we were awful parents, then we would do so, but this was something that he could control.
During the one semester that he spent in public school, we did have reason to discuss his diagnosis with the school counselor and one of his teachers, but I can’t say that either one of them made a large effort to understand it. We also discussed it with our pastor, and later with the director of the Christian school that we enrolled him in during his junior year of high school. Other than that, we kept quiet about it, knowing that in the small town in which we lived, it wasn’t necessarily to anyone’s benefit for him be assigned a label.
After discussing it with his therapist, we agreed that there was no harm in letting him in on the secret. We let him have access to some of the attachment books that we had, hiding only the ones that spoke of the possibility that they would grow up to be serial killers, not wanting to give him any ideas that he may not have already had. In fact, I seeded my library with books that I wanted him to read, knowing that if I had simply asked him to read them, he wouldn’t. More than a few of them made their way to his room, so it worked.
As for school, that didn’t work out very well. A full week of attachment parenting could be undone in one day of public school, as he was being rewarded for all of the wrong behaviors. Plus, he wasn’t turning in his work, completing tests, or doing much of anything productive. After that first semester, we pulled him from public school and homeschooled him for a few years, which was much easier, less time-consuming, and far more productive. This, of course, would not be the case with every child or in every family; and we did find that it was better if I taught him rather than my wife, since she was the one that he most wanted to displease.
I have seen the Nancy Thomas video, but I don’t think that anyone at his public school would have taken the time to watch it. It’s an excellent video, though.
As for your question about attachment therapy and Dr. Hughes, our attachment therapist had trained under him and was in communication with him. We met with him a couple of times, but he was not our primary therapist. Most of the sessions involved my wife, who was the mother in his life, and my nephew, although I was present for most of the attachment sessions as well. A couple of times, she met with just my wife and my nephew, and once with just myself and him, but the majority of the bonding effort was between my nephew and my wife.
We learned that we could rate the value of his therapy sessions by his reactions later on. When some real work was being done in therapy, he would rage later, sometimes even before we got home. We came to recognize that as a good thing, realizing that one-step forward and two-steps back was still a step forward, and since he had made that step once, he knew that he could go there again without anything tragic happening.
We also learned that it does no good whatsoever to kick yourself over anything that might have been said or done in the past. We tried to be consistent and in control, but there were times when we couldn’t withstand the onslaught and might say something that wasn’t exactly helpful. Parents are neither superhuman or perfect. I had no trouble apologizing to my nephew, telling him that I had said things to him that I shouldn’t have said, and that I had done so because I was angry. Since he knew full well that he was trying to make me angry and was well aware of his success, my apology actually served to take some of the power back.
One trap that we had walked into, for the sake of consistency, was the idea that once we made a decision we would have to stick with it even if we realized that we had done so in anger, and could see that it wasn’t having a desirable effect. We grounded our nephew to his room for a month one time after he kept escalating whatever it was that he was doing wrong at the time, and then believed that we had to stick with it since we had told him that he was going to be confined to his room for a month. Since we lived in what had once been a three-unit apartment, his “room” included a bedroom, dining room, and full bathroom, so it wasn’t quite as bad as it sounded. Still, it was more of a punishment for us than it was to him.
We later determined that consistency meant that we were in control, and that meant that we were free to change things when they weren’t working out. Still later, we realized that it was best if we didn’t assign a consequence until we were no longer angry about the action that precipitated it.
Although I haven’t read this in any of the books, one thing that we kept trying to do was to treat him like a normal kid as long as he was acting like a normal kid, so that we could enjoy the times when he was doing this, and in the hopes that he would realize that whenever he was tired of attachment parenting, he could simply quit acting like someone who was in need of it. I don’t know that this is a therapeutically useful model to follow, but it did allow us to have some good times and gave us a basis upon which to judge the progress that he was making.
I believe that it was useful for us, but that it may not be for everyone.
– ken